> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.dailydetroit.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Michigan Election Update: Senate Polls & Ballot Proposals
- URL: https://www.dailydetroit.com/episodes/michigan-election-update-senate-polls-ballot-proposals/
- Published: 2026-10-15T22:10:14.000Z
- Updated: 2026-10-15T22:12:21.000Z
- Author: Jer Staes
- Tags: Politics and Policy

Norris Howard and I are back at the studio breaking down where key Michigan races and statewide ballot proposals stand as we head into the home stretch of the 2026 election season. We took into account your feedback to cover some more topics.

## What we talk about:

The U.S. Senate Race: We dive into the latest polling averages from Decision Desk HQ showing Abdul El-Sayed building a lead over Mike Rogers, the fallout from debate no-shows, and what major late-stage endorsements (including Barack Obama and Kamala Harris) mean for voters in Michigan.

The Governor’s Race: Norris and I look at Jocelyn Benson’s strong polling lead over John James and break down where the James campaign lost momentum along the way.

Downballot Deep Dive: You asked for more coverage on downballot races, so we're giving proper airtime to the quiet contests for Secretary of State (Garlin Gilchrist vs. Anthony Forlini) and Attorney General (Eli Savit vs. Doug Lloyd). 

Proposal 1 (Constitutional Convention): Why this question pops up on our ballot automatically, what a "yes" vote actually means for rewriting the state constitution, and why both Norris and I have serious reservations about opening that door.

Proposal 2 (Michigan Money Out of Politics): What this ballot initiative would mean for restricting campaign contributions from regulated monopolies like DTE and Consumers Energy, expanding ad disclosures, and the potential legal battles ahead. 

Support the Podcast! If you appreciate our independent local coverage, consider supporting Daily Detroit on Patreon! Members get access to our subscriber-only Discord, exclusive newsletter updates, sticker packs, and more.

```vtt
WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:09.120
[Music] Daily Detroit is brought to you by the community. Support our work at patreon.com/dailydetroit. [Music]

00:09.120 --> 00:18.880
Hello friends and welcome to your Daily Detroit. It is Thursday, October 15th, 2026. I am Jer Staes coming to you from our studio at TechTown.

00:18.880 --> 00:26.560
And across the table from me is none other than the Prince of Brightmoor himself, Norris Howard. How are you?

00:26.560 --> 00:38.280
You know what? I am chilling, I'm feeling well. The west side is back once again, but I got to say this and I got to be very 100% with this.

00:38.280 --> 00:46.040
There are significantly more stupid people in my media vicinity than I previously thought. This election has proven that to me.

00:46.040 --> 00:58.320
So how? Because I have tended to believe that there is always like a number of people who whether they be stupid or they just don't care, because I think those are two different buckets.

00:58.320 --> 01:03.200
I know some smart people who just don't care. I find it stupid to not care.

01:03.200 --> 01:10.760
I find based on everything that's going on in the country right now, if you do not care, I will mark that as a sign of stupidity[cite: 1].

01:10.760 --> 01:21.080
Like I want people to exercise their right, I want people to be involved, but also like if you literally don't care at all, I'm not sure if you should participate[cite: 1].

01:21.080 --> 01:23.000
Like maybe you should sit yourself out[cite: 1].

01:23.000 --> 01:30.960
I mean, but I feel like if you're that tuned out, you're probably not voting. And I also think if you're not voting, then you're wack and kind of dumb[cite: 1]. [Laughter]

01:30.960 --> 01:42.560
Well, this is kind of a tease for what today's episode's going to be because, you know, it is election season. We are in the very much home stretch of all these things[cite: 1]. And so what we're going to do is try to kind of keep our politics to one-ish episodes per week[cite: 1].

01:42.560 --> 01:50.000
Kind of keep it contained unless something pops up in the news that we got to talk about[cite: 1]. Because I know a lot of people are really passionate about this[cite: 1].

01:50.000 --> 01:57.160
Yeah. And they want us to talk about the campaigns, what we see in the polls, even though we have our own questions about the polls[cite: 1].

01:57.160 --> 02:00.680
People keep saying talk about the polls or don't talk about the polls[cite: 1]. You cannot talk about the polls[cite: 1]. [Laughter]

02:00.680 --> 02:11.840
We're going to talk a little bit about it. Not every day like the way, no, no, no[cite: 1]. Exactly, but we will get into averages and be honest, like we will be in a couple of races where, frankly, there's not enough data to look at a lot, which is another thing that concerns me[cite: 1].

02:11.840 --> 02:22.400
So today's episode is going to be all about that home stretch of the political season here in Michigan and Metro Detroit[cite: 1].

02:22.400 --> 02:27.760
So why don't we start with the race that's taken up all the air[cite: 1]?

02:27.760 --> 02:33.280
And then we're going to get into a bunch of down-ballot stuff with what we have time for, because I think it's important to give it some attention because all the other races aren't getting talked about very much[cite: 1].

02:33.280 --> 02:40.800
But I think we need to start with the U.S. Senatorial race, Abdul El-Sayed, Mike Rogers, the latest updates[cite: 1].

02:40.800 --> 02:50.720
I wanted to share some polling that I was looking at that it seems like El-Sayed is actually starting to put together a little bit more of a lead according to Decision Desk HQ's average is now up to 49.3%[cite: 1]

02:50.720 --> 02:56.560
over Mike Rogers' 45.9, nearly 46[cite: 1]. People are starting to find homes in these last few weeks[cite: 1].

02:56.560 --> 03:02.880
Once she hit that 50 though, once she hit that 50%, it's rough for you to come back after you get above 50% on one candidate[cite: 1].

03:02.880 --> 03:09.120
And we'll get there in the next race. But really, what is sitting in your mind in this home stretch here[cite: 1]?

03:09.120 --> 03:16.800
Because I hear a lot of the questions out there, whether it is, is Mike Rogers going to be like Donald Trump[cite: 1]?

03:16.800 --> 03:22.800
Is, if you were in the Jewish community, do you feel safe voting for Abdul El-Sayed[cite: 1]?

03:22.800 --> 03:32.280
If you are in various other ethnic communities that have issues with Muslims, like there's a very, what I'm seeing here is Michigan's, there's a number that stuck out to me in a recent poll[cite: 1].

03:32.280 --> 03:38.280
37% of Michiganders are not sure if they would vote for a Muslim for anything, and that is coming very clear[cite: 1].

03:38.280 --> 03:41.840
And the thing is, is that I don't think that's within just one party[cite: 1].

03:41.840 --> 03:48.320
No, it's definitely not just within one party, and we've seen that play out across the political discourse over the past six months or so[cite: 1].

03:48.320 --> 03:57.160
I think when we're talking about this Senate race in particular, there's a couple of flashpoints that stick out to me that I think have really pushed people into one camp or the other[cite: 1].

03:57.160 --> 04:02.720
I think one of the big flashpoints was Mike Rogers not showing up for the Fox 2 debate[cite: 1].

04:02.720 --> 04:10.200
I think once the news got out that he just simply just didn't show up, a lot of people were very, very, very upset about that[cite: 1].

04:10.200 --> 04:18.040
Because at bare minimum, you should be able to stand up to questioning. Now, he did show up to the WOOD-TV debate, which was on the west side of the state[cite: 1],

04:18.040 --> 04:23.760
which tends to be a lot more, I should say, purply than Southeast Michigan where the Fox 2 debate was taking place[cite: 1].

04:23.760 --> 04:31.960
But I think also on top of that, you had news of some of these big endorsements that Abdul El-Sayed was starting to obtain[cite: 1].

04:31.960 --> 04:38.080
Kamala Harris came out to endorse him. We got word that Barack Obama is going to be in town next week[cite: 1].

04:38.080 --> 04:43.080
More importantly than even being in town, it's cutting the ad, right[cite: 1]? Because I think it's really easy when you follow this stuff all the time to get in your political bubble[cite: 1].

04:43.080 --> 04:50.840
It's a whole different thing to see him say the words himself. It really matters in whoever's endorsement, how much they stand on business with it[cite: 1],

04:50.840 --> 04:57.360
tells voters something. Yeah, absolutely. And listen, we know the power of the ads. We know the power of the mailers. We saw it during the primary[cite: 1].

04:57.360 --> 05:07.880
We don't need to go back over that. But having some of these key endorsements from former legislators, a former president, you know, again, Barack Obama is the golden goose of endorsements[cite: 1],

05:07.880 --> 05:14.680
especially when it comes to the Black vote, the Latino vote, the educated white woman vote[cite: 1].

05:14.680 --> 05:20.520
Like those three demographics deliver elections, and a lot of it comes through a man like Barack Obama[cite: 1].

05:20.520 --> 05:27.760
So how much of this is "it's the economy, stupid"? Because I mean, you look at the Fox polling, and I know people groan that I'm quoting Fox[cite: 1],

05:27.760 --> 05:35.040
but to be honest, Fox's polling operation has been decently good for many years, and they use pollsters both on the left, on the right[cite: 1],

05:35.040 --> 05:40.240
because they try to get accurate information, because if you actually—if you want to be somebody who's a good propagandist, you want to know where people actually are[cite: 1].

05:40.240 --> 05:46.360
You got to know where people are. Your data—the data coming in has to be good so you know how to effectively subvert it[cite: 1]. [Laughter]

05:46.360 --> 05:54.680
But, you know, I think it is the economy. I think that's the single biggest factor that we see motivating Mid-Michigan and Northern Michigan and the U.P.[cite: 1]

05:54.680 --> 06:01.320
Like those are the things that are—you know, the pocketbook issues. And obviously those affect everyone, but I think when we're starting to see what is pushing sort of the reluctant voter[cite: 1]

06:01.320 --> 06:08.520
or maybe the person who wouldn't normally vote for a candidate like an Abdul or for any Democrat for that matter[cite: 1],

06:08.520 --> 06:14.920
these economic issues, the pocketbook, as they say, dinner table issues, those are the things that I've heard in person[cite: 1]

06:14.920 --> 06:20.440
because I go to a lot of these events. I go to the rallies and the town halls and stuff[cite: 1].

06:20.440 --> 06:27.240
There's three questions that you get: You get the economy question, you get the data center/AI question[cite: 1],

06:27.240 --> 06:33.720
and then you get a community-specific question, whether it be protections for LGBTQ youth, whether it be protections of oversurveillance, overpolicing[cite: 1],

06:33.720 --> 06:38.560
or you get the Israel question, which is also very big with the youth vote[cite: 1].

06:38.560 --> 06:46.040
36% approval rate is what the current situation is for President Trump with the Fox poll[cite: 1],

06:46.040 --> 06:51.960
which tells me that every Republican in the United States is digging out of a hole[cite: 1].

06:51.960 --> 06:57.080
I will say a lot of feedback on our episodes was a persistent fear of socialism[cite: 1].

06:57.080 --> 07:04.280
And I think I want to be really clear here. I am convinced most people have no idea what socialism, democratic socialism, or communism actually means[cite: 1].

07:04.280 --> 07:11.760
I've read so many pieces of feedback and please go do some research with real sources and maybe read a book or two[cite: 1],

07:11.760 --> 07:16.840
because there are arguments—and this actually gets me a little upset[cite: 1].

07:16.840 --> 07:22.920
There are actually free market arguments against Medicare for All. I don't agree with them all, but none of them are being made[cite: 1].

07:22.920 --> 07:30.080
None of them are being made about some of the concerns that you could have. It is all in these broad strokes about ideas that it's clear nobody involved[cite: 1]—

07:30.080 --> 07:33.920
and some on the left don't even know what they mean[cite: 1]. And that to me is a problem[cite: 1],

07:33.920 --> 07:40.400
because we're trying to decide how we're doing things. We're so frustrated. You know, economics, one piece of feedback talked about how, well, they understand young people aren't doing well[cite: 1].

07:40.400 --> 07:47.360
But do they understand how poorly people 35 and under are doing[cite: 1], or how poorly people in my cohort from 40 to 50 are doing[cite: 1]?

07:47.360 --> 07:54.680
The current system isn't working. And right now in our world, we have an option of one or the other. And I firmly believe that Donald Trump was elected because people, in part, they do want a change[cite: 1].

07:54.680 --> 07:58.280
It's just that change didn't work out.

07:58.280 --> 08:05.120
No, it was the change that was palatable to them at the time[cite: 1]. And let me just say this, I agree with you, Jer[cite: 1]. A lot of people do not understand what socialism is[cite: 1],

08:05.120 --> 08:11.160
because let me tell you, everybody loves the biggest socialist program we already have in America: Social Security[cite: 1].

08:11.160 --> 08:18.960
That is a socialist program. We go to work and we pay into a program—everyone that pays taxes or has a paycheck pays into Social Security[cite: 1]

08:18.960 --> 08:24.760
to care for our oldest and most vulnerable. Everybody likes Social Security[cite: 1].

08:24.760 --> 08:30.800
It polls at like 80%. Almost no one dislikes Social Security[cite: 1].

08:30.800 --> 08:36.680
So if we're talking about the government's ability to have a program that helps take care of people, we already see that they do that[cite: 1].

08:36.680 --> 08:43.720
So I'm not necessarily making it as a Medicare for All argument at this moment. I'm just saying there are already social programs and socialism-lite in the country[cite: 1]

08:43.720 --> 08:48.360
that you're already used to, but since no one has outright called it socialism, you're cool with it[cite: 1].

08:48.360 --> 08:52.480
You know, the other thing is, and I saw you in some comments out there, because you're outside on the internet[cite: 1].

08:52.480 --> 08:57.160
I be outside. I be outside. A lot of people who even if it's—they have to be right[cite: 1].

08:57.160 --> 09:03.440
Yes, we have to eliminate that. We've got to—if we're going to get ourselves out of this hole, and this country is in a hole and it's been in a hole for a long time[cite: 1].

09:03.440 --> 09:08.760
Donald Trump is not a cause, it's a symptom, right[cite: 1]? And what I mean by that is the kind of discourse that Donald Trump brought us[cite: 1],

09:08.760 --> 09:14.360
not just—I'm not talking about even just him the person. He can't exist as an entity without us allowing him to exist[cite: 1].

09:14.360 --> 09:19.440
And part of that on all political sides is the lack of curiosity[cite: 1].

09:19.440 --> 09:25.560
I think it's the lack of curiosity. I think it's the lack of wanting to be challenged with ideas[cite: 1].

09:25.560 --> 09:32.400
So, you know, if you've seen me on Threads or you see me anywhere, you know, I'm not so highfalutin to where I feel like I know everything[cite: 1].

09:32.400 --> 09:39.120
If somebody presents to me information that is contrary to what I already think, then sure, let me explore the information[cite: 1].

09:39.120 --> 09:44.800
And if we go back, then we could talk about how maybe I may have been wrong about that, or maybe I was coming at it from a wrong angle[cite: 1].

09:44.800 --> 09:50.920
There's nothing wrong with that. There is nothing wrong with being wrong[cite: 1].

09:50.920 --> 09:57.360
There is something wrong with standing on being wrong and continuing to double down on it[cite: 1].

09:57.360 --> 10:04.280
And I think that's sort of the mark of frustration that people like me and many other people are feeling, particularly as it pertains to the Trump administration[cite: 1],

10:04.280 --> 10:11.240
where, you know, plenty of people sat back and said, you know, there's no plans here[cite: 1].

10:11.240 --> 10:18.440
There's nothing here that actually would make this economic situation better. This plan would actively make the economic situation worse[cite: 1].

10:18.440 --> 10:24.400
This plan will actively make our relationship internationally with our allies and with other nations more fraught[cite: 1].

10:24.400 --> 10:31.760
Plenty of people were saying these things, but instead of sitting back, looking at the information, and saying, "Okay, you may have a point,"[cite: 1]

10:31.760 --> 10:38.200
plenty of people just went to their side of the football field and just said, "This is my team, and I'm rocking with it[cite: 1],

10:38.200 --> 10:42.920
win, lose, or draw, right or wrong, I got to rock with it." Y'all, this is not gangs[cite: 1].

10:42.920 --> 10:48.360
Like, this is not, for real, this is not Blood In Blood Out. Like, you do not have to ride for these people[cite: 1].

10:48.360 --> 10:55.080
If they're wrong, you should be the first one talking about how wrong they are[cite: 1].

10:55.080 --> 11:00.680
So it is okay for you to change your mind[cite: 1]. It is okay for your opinion to evolve[cite: 1].

11:00.680 --> 11:07.480
That's all right. And if that puts you in opposition with certain people, fine[cite: 1]. But just understand, it is okay to have a difference of opinion two, three, four, five years down the line[cite: 1].

11:07.480 --> 11:15.560
Well, let's move on to the Governor's race. I will mention if you are happening to catch this podcast in time, there will be a debate between Jocelyn Benson and John James here in Detroit at the Channel 4 studios[cite: 1].

11:15.560 --> 11:22.560
It'll be on the air Channel 4 WDIV 8:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.[cite: 1]

11:22.560 --> 11:30.840
The latest Decision Desk polling puts Jocelyn in the driver seat. We kind of saw that with the Republicans pulling their money out of ad buys for John James[cite: 1].

11:30.840 --> 11:36.440
If you see the ad buys collapse, that's always a good sign for the other candidate, right[cite: 1]?

11:36.440 --> 11:44.200
So for Jocelyn, in these polling averages, she is now north of 51% with John James down in the 43s[cite: 1],

11:44.200 --> 11:51.120
more than a 7-point lead. I'm not saying that she's got it on lock, because you never know till the votes are in[cite: 1],

11:51.120 --> 11:55.160
but this race is settling out[cite: 1]. Yeah, it's settling out[cite: 1].

11:55.160 --> 12:02.040
I think it was always going to be an uphill battle for John James. And I think, unfortunately, when you have the whole country in a Democrat plus 7 or 10 in some places environment[cite: 1],

12:02.040 --> 12:08.520
you are already going to be working with a deficit. But I think the big thing that we're seeing with the John James campaign is there was just kind of misstep after misstep[cite: 1].

12:08.520 --> 12:15.360
There was the first part of the campaign where we just didn't see him, didn't hear from him. There were no events, no town halls[cite: 1].

12:15.360 --> 12:22.440
You had a big fiasco at the Republican nominating committee where he didn't really show up to that in time[cite: 1].

12:22.440 --> 12:28.000
And then you had Perry Johnson, who spent millions of dollars to talk about him[cite: 1].

12:28.000 --> 12:35.320
But I think some of the bigger missteps in this primary is the fact that we didn't see John James actually spending time talking about how he would help his base[cite: 1],

12:35.320 --> 12:41.800
talking about the things that would actually assist people in rural communities, assist people in these big cities that are struggling with things like car insurance and health insurance[cite: 1].

12:41.800 --> 12:48.360
We didn't hear those things. We didn't hear about a plan for the future. We just heard kind of, you know, "We ride with Trump, and Trump is the president."[cite: 1]

12:48.360 --> 12:54.680
And then halfway through September, he just stopped talking about Trump altogether[cite: 1],

12:54.680 --> 12:59.200
because the polling is showing that that platform is not winning[cite: 1]. And so now, what does a candidate like John James have if he can't glam onto the Trump platform[cite: 1]?

12:59.200 --> 13:06.000
And people are starting to see that. We saw it in the last debate, and I'll be interested to see how he'll combat it in this debate[cite: 1].

13:06.000 --> 13:13.920
But, you know, being completely objective here, it's just been a really bad campaign from John James[cite: 1]. It's one thing to say if somebody ran a great campaign[cite: 1]. This campaign's been terrible[cite: 1].

13:13.920 --> 13:21.280
Let's talk about some races that don't have much overall polling. In fact, so little polling, we can't really put together an average[cite: 1],

13:21.280 --> 13:26.560
so we're not going to stick numbers to it. I just want some of your quick impressions. For Secretary of State, you've got Garlin Gilchrist versus Anthony Forlini[cite: 1].

13:26.560 --> 13:32.840
Gilchrist is the Democrat, Forlini the Republican. And then Eli Savit for Attorney General on the Democratic side versus Doug Lloyd[cite: 1].

13:32.840 --> 13:38.800
It seems like Garlin's having a better time than Eli is[cite: 1].

13:38.800 --> 13:45.360
Yeah, you know, I think Garlin obviously has big name recognition, current Lieutenant Governor of the state[cite: 1],

13:45.360 --> 13:51.360
very well-liked politician in Michigan, big profile[cite: 1], a guy that I think for the most part[cite: 1]

13:51.360 --> 13:57.160
was going to have to trip himself up if he was going to lose this particular election, and it seems like he's just running solid[cite: 1].

13:57.160 --> 14:02.560
And has a background as a data nerd[cite: 1]? Yep. So it's like, "Oh, this guy makes sense in this job."[cite: 1]

14:02.560 --> 14:09.640
Yeah, absolutely. And so, you know, I think it was going to be really difficult for him to sort of drop his lead[cite: 1].

14:09.640 --> 14:16.480
And, you know, Anthony Forlini is a guy who has not necessarily said that he believes in the results of certain elections[cite: 1].

14:16.480 --> 14:23.280
And I know that's a big thing with certain parts of the electorate. However, that squeeze for that juice has become a little bit dry[cite: 1].

14:23.280 --> 14:30.400
A lot of people are not necessarily buying that as a rallying cry as much as they did two years ago or even four years ago[cite: 1].

14:30.400 --> 14:36.440
And so I think people look at Garlin and they say, "You know, I know that guy, so I'm going to rock with him."[cite: 1]

14:36.440 --> 14:41.920
So with Eli, here's the thing. There is a thing—and this is my anecdotal observation, and you're more steeped in some of this stuff than I am[cite: 1].

14:41.920 --> 14:48.880
But my anecdotal observation is that like one of the most difficult races for a progressive to win is anything involving attorney general or prosecutor[cite: 1].

14:48.880 --> 14:55.760
Yes. And because there is a thing with a lot of the electorate where they worry, they're like, "Okay, with healthcare, with this, okay, maybe I'll give the progressives a chance."[cite: 1]

14:55.760 --> 15:02.720
With the AG or with prosecutor, there is more of—in fact, you'll even see it often where you'll have three Democrats and one Republican[cite: 1].

15:02.720 --> 15:08.080
That Republican will be the prosecutor or AG. That happens a lot in America[cite: 1]. Yeah, it does.

15:08.080 --> 15:13.680
You know, listen, I don't see a situation in which tons of people split their ticket this time[cite: 1].

15:13.680 --> 15:19.480
We saw it last time when Trump was on the ticket, and listen, Doug Lloyd is not Trump[cite: 1].

15:19.480 --> 15:26.560
So I do not see a lot of people splitting their ticket. However, I think Eli does have an uphill battle because he is a more progressive AG[cite: 1].

15:26.560 --> 15:32.240
He is a guy who is coming from Washtenaw County, which is one of our more progressive counties[cite: 1].

15:32.240 --> 15:36.000
Kind of the California of Michigan[cite: 1]. The California of Michigan, absolutely[cite: 1].

15:36.000 --> 15:42.360
And so that already gives, you know, certain more moderate or more conservative voters a moment of pause[cite: 1].

15:42.360 --> 15:48.400
Again, though, I think, you know, I've just seen Eli Savit more[cite: 1].

15:48.400 --> 15:53.640
I've seen him more places. I haven't seen Doug Lloyd. And listen, y'all, I do this for a living[cite: 1].

15:53.640 --> 15:59.600
I've no issue going to some of these events, whether they be—I've gone to Trump events, I've gone to conservative events[cite: 1].

15:59.600 --> 16:05.120
It's not a big deal. The problem is, it's just we're not seeing people like Doug Lloyd and Forlini and the rest of them as much as we're seeing some of the Democrats and some of the progressive candidates[cite: 1].

16:05.120 --> 16:11.440
Why that is, I don't know, I can't speak to that[cite: 1]. But I think with Eli, he's going to have to continue to get his name out[cite: 1].

16:11.440 --> 16:17.320
And I think for Doug Lloyd, he's just got to appear places. People don't know what he stands for outside of, you know, your general sort of MAGA-lite platform[cite: 1].

16:17.320 --> 16:24.400
I can totally say that this is probably my City of Detroit bias. I feel like I've seen a lot more of the Garlin Gilchrist race[cite: 1],

16:24.400 --> 16:30.360
and that could just be because I'm a city person[cite: 1]. But with both of these races, compared to previous cycles[cite: 1],

16:30.360 --> 16:36.880
it feels like both of these have been very quiet races. I feel like I've seen almost nothing about them[cite: 1], and I pay attention more than the average bear[cite: 1].

16:36.880 --> 16:44.200
Yeah, no, I think it's definitely been—these two races, the AG race and the Secretary of State race[cite: 1],

16:44.200 --> 16:50.840
I think definitely have been sort of pushed out by just the sheer electricity of the Senate race[cite: 1].

16:50.840 --> 16:56.640
I think these two have suffered the most[cite: 1]. But, you know, we shall see when it comes to election day[cite: 1].

16:56.640 --> 17:02.960
And by the way, it looks like we might hear record numbers for absentee ballots, by the way[cite: 1].

17:02.960 --> 17:10.080
Last time I checked, over 30,000 absentees had already been returned[cite: 1]. That is on par to potentially break a record for a midterm[cite: 1].

17:10.080 --> 17:17.320
Let's spend a few minutes and end on the proposals. We're not going to get super in depth, but I want to tell you what they are and kind of discuss our initial impressions[cite: 1].

17:17.320 --> 17:23.160
I'm working on interviews around both of these to talk about what's happening[cite: 1].

17:23.160 --> 17:30.320
And if you've got some people, let me know, dailydetroit@gmail.com, whether it's this or other things[cite: 1]. I love the feedback.

17:30.320 --> 17:36.960
One of the key pieces of feedback we got was, "Let's talk about down-ballot races." That's one of the reasons why we're doing this is because you all asked for it[cite: 1].

17:36.960 --> 17:44.040
So Proposal 1 is not a vote on a new constitution, it's a vote on whether to start writing one[cite: 1].

17:44.040 --> 17:49.600
If it passes, Michigan would elect delegates to a constitutional convention in 2027[cite: 1].

17:49.600 --> 17:55.560
Whatever they make would still need voter approval[cite: 1]. Supporters see a chance to overhaul state government[cite: 1];

17:55.560 --> 18:02.680
opponents see an expensive, unpredictable process where voters can already amend the constitution one issue at a time[cite: 1].

18:02.680 --> 18:08.560
I have some thoughts on this, Proposal 1[cite: 1]. I'll let you go first.

18:08.560 --> 18:14.320
It's wack! [Laughter] I don't know, Jer![cite: 1] So Proposal 1 gets put onto our ballots—how many years[cite: 1]?

18:14.320 --> 18:20.120
It's like automatically—it's an automatic thing that goes into our ballot every few years[cite: 1].

18:20.120 --> 18:26.520
And it's wack[cite: 1]. And the reason why it's wack, and I have no issue saying it's wack, is because, one, it's going to cost us a bajillion dollars[cite: 1].

18:26.520 --> 18:32.840
Like, it costs a lot. It will have to be an extra election cycle in a year where we should not be having an election cycle[cite: 1].

18:32.840 --> 18:39.120
And it also opens up the—it opens up the door just for a lot of other influence to come into the mix[cite: 1]

18:39.120 --> 18:45.320
because we will have to elect delegates to go to the constitutional convention, and then they rewrite the constitution[cite: 1],

18:45.320 --> 18:50.840
and we have no say in that after we send those people off[cite: 1]. So I think, you know, for a lot of people, it's just—it's too much process, it's too big[cite: 1],

18:50.840 --> 18:57.120
and we slightly lose control[cite: 1]. And there's some big issues we've just passed on the constitution, by the way, that I think would be in danger[cite: 1]

18:57.120 --> 19:01.320
if we were to do something like that[cite: 1]. Specifically, Republicans have said that they look at it as an opportunity to repeal women's rights[cite: 1].

19:01.320 --> 19:07.720
Women's rights, absolutely. Repeal women's rights[cite: 1]. But there's a lot of other things. There's the right to work that we just repealed, that could be up for grabs again[cite: 1].

19:07.720 --> 19:12.640
There's a ton of stuff. So for me, I think this is a moment to remind folks that we need to hold our legislators accountable[cite: 1],

19:12.640 --> 19:18.400
because instead of a constitution, people just need to do their jobs[cite: 1]. If our legislature did its job—whether it—I mean, this is true for the federal level[cite: 1],

19:18.400 --> 19:24.400
but on the state level too—if the legislature is doing its job, there really isn't a need for this, right[cite: 1]?

19:24.400 --> 19:30.400
They can write laws. If they even want to make amendments, they could do different things[cite: 1]. So I think that that is a key to this[cite: 1].

19:30.400 --> 19:37.080
I think that it's just too dangerous to do. As much as I am a big policy nerd, I have large reservations with this one[cite: 1].

19:37.080 --> 19:44.400
Now, Proposal 2 would restrict certain campaign contributions from regulated utilities, large government contractors, and people or organizations connected to them[cite: 1].

19:44.400 --> 19:50.840
It would also expand disclosure rules for political advertising, including paid internet messages and some ads that avoid explicitly telling you how to vote[cite: 1].

19:50.840 --> 19:56.920
Supporters call it a way to reduce conflicts of interest and expose political money[cite: 1]; opponents say it goes too far in restricting political speech[cite: 1].

19:56.920 --> 20:02.800
This is known as Michigan Money Out of Politics[cite: 1]. Yes, yes, MMOP for those who have been hearing this in political circles[cite: 1].

20:02.800 --> 20:10.120
This is one of those situations in which, you know, people have been looking for a mechanism to be able to rein in political spending[cite: 1].

20:10.120 --> 20:16.880
This is what this is trying to do[cite: 1]. Essentially, when we're talking about regulated monopolies and utilities, we're talking about DTE and Consumers[cite: 1].

20:16.880 --> 20:22.440
Those are really the two big ones that come to everybody's mind[cite: 1]. And effectively what this would do is remove their ability to donate to political campaigns[cite: 1].

20:22.440 --> 20:27.720
If that sounds like something you're into, then this is your jam[cite: 1]. You should vote yes on it[cite: 1].

20:27.720 --> 20:34.000
Now, I really understand the spirit of this one. This is one where I have some questions to some legal beagles[cite: 1].

20:34.000 --> 20:40.880
There is a lot of concern from nonpartisan groups that there are parts of this that could be repealed back in court challenges[cite: 1].

20:40.880 --> 20:47.480
And specifically, that's around the fact that our Supreme Court has said that money is speech[cite: 1], and regulating money—so there could be parts of this[cite: 1]

20:47.480 --> 20:53.000
that might end up having a very long fight in the courts. It could, man[cite: 1], and it could be a thing that does eventually go all the way up and challenges something like Citizens United[cite: 1],

20:53.000 --> 20:59.840
because, you know, if it comes down to the Supreme Court saying, "Well, a state can decide what regulations it does for itself," then you know what, hey, MMOP already is there[cite: 1].

20:59.840 --> 21:06.400
If it turns into an even larger fight over is money actually speech and should people be able to donate to these dark money campaigns[cite: 1],

21:06.400 --> 21:12.720
then that's going to be a whole thing that's fought at the federal level[cite: 1]. But I think for a lot of people who have been very frustrated about political contributions[cite: 1],

21:12.720 --> 21:18.960
about dark money, about—let's just keep it for real, just upset that DTE just does not provide the quality of service that it should[cite: 1],

21:18.960 --> 21:26.040
I think a lot of people are looking at this as something of a big opportunity[cite: 1].

21:26.040 --> 21:32.320
Well, as always, your constructive feedback is welcome, dailydetroit@gmail.com[cite: 1]. And yes, I even read the unconstructive notes, too[cite: 1].

21:32.320 --> 21:38.280
Yeah, we read them, but, you know, stop it! [Laughter][cite: 1] If you're constructive, you know how I love a good mailbag episode[cite: 1],

21:38.280 --> 21:44.200
but if all you're doing is yelling at us and calling us slurs, then please just stay out of the inbox and go do something else[cite: 1].

21:44.200 --> 21:50.080
Yeah, save your slurs for an inanimate object[cite: 1], or in fact, maybe evaluate and consider a therapy session[cite: 1].

21:50.080 --> 21:56.560
Yes! Actually, yes, therapy! Therapy! [Laughter][cite: 1] All right, well, that is it for today. Thank you so much to our members on Patreon, patreon.com/dailydetroit[cite: 1].

21:56.560 --> 22:03.120
We are doing a ton of stuff on our newsletter. We've got so much happening[cite: 1]. Check us out, what we're doing, patreon.com/dailydetroit[cite: 1].

22:03.120 --> 22:08.840
On there, we have our member-only Discord, sticker packs, all kinds of stuff[cite: 1], plus our very special membership benefit that we will be launching[cite: 1]

22:08.840 --> 22:15.800
right after the election. Doing it before the election, too much[cite: 1]. But right—after the election and before Thanksgiving[cite: 1].

22:15.800 --> 22:21.080
That sounds good. We have something for you for your turkey[cite: 1]. To have fun after you eat your turkey[cite: 1].

22:21.080 --> 22:27.280
All I want to do is lay down. [Laughter] There's that, too[cite: 1]. Maybe there should be a whole guide to naps[cite: 1].

22:27.280 --> 22:33.720
There you go. All right, anyway, thank you so much for your support. It means a ton. It keeps things going[cite: 1].

22:33.720 --> 22:39.920
With that, I am Jer Staes. And I'm Norris Howard.[cite: 1] Thank you so much for listening. Remember that you are somebody, and we'll see you around Detroit[cite: 1]. [Music]
```

```chapters
00:00 – Intro & Election Fatigue Discussion
02:22 – U.S. Senate Race: Abdul El-Sayed vs. Mike Rogers
11:07 – Michigan Governor's Race: Jocelyn Benson vs. John James
13:13 – Downballot Races: Secretary of State & Attorney General
17:10 – Proposal 1: Constitutional Convention Question
19:37 – Proposal 2: Money in Politics & Campaign Finance
21:26 – Outro & Patreon Announcement
```